BREAKING: Transgender Women Are Not Legally Female, 🇬🇧 UK Supreme Court Rules




The UK Supreme Court has ruled that transgender women cannot be legally considered “women” in all legal contexts, particularly in areas such as:

Access to single-sex spaces (locker rooms, prisons, shelters for victims of violence).

Women’s sports, to ensure “competitive fairness”.

Official documents, where biological sex prevails over self-declared gender identity.

The ruling follows an appeal by conservative feminist groups, who feared it would “annul the rights of biological women”.

THE LEGAL CONTEXT


Gender Recognition Act (2004): Until now, it allowed a person to change their legal gender after a diagnosis of dysphoria and two years of transition.

New interpretation: The Court stated that biological sex remains a priority in contexts where “physical difference is relevant”.

Exceptions: Self-determination remains possible in non-critical contexts (e.g. work, social life).

HOW DID THE MAJORITY OF BRITISH PEOPLE REACT?


According to a YouGov poll (July 2024):

62% of respondents supported the decision, believing that biological sex and gender identity should be distinguished by law.

Main reasons: Protection of women’s spaces (55%), fairness in sport (48%), protection of minors (33%).

28% opposed, calling the ruling “a step backwards on human rights”.

Criticism: “Legitimacy of discrimination” (61%), “Ignores medical science” (39%).

10% have no opinion.

Demographic differences:

Over 55s: 78% in favor.

Under 35s: 44% in favor, 49% against.

Tory voters: 81% for vs. Labour voters: 53% against.

IMMEDIATE REACTIONS


🔵 Who applauds:

Kathleen Stock (philosopher): “Victory for realism: women exist, and they have rights to defend”.

Maya Forstater (activist): “Finally, it is recognized that unlimited self-determination puts women at risk”.

Conservative Party: “Balanced decision that reconciles rights and biological reality”.

🌈 Who condemns:

Stonewall (LGBTQ+ NGO): “Obscurantist ruling. Denying gender identity is institutional violence”.

Munroe Bergdorf (trans model): “The UK is becoming a desert for trans people”.

Labour Party: “A stab in the arm of the LGBTQ+ community. We will restore rights”.

FUTURE SCENARIOS


Risk of litigation: Trans associations promise to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

Domino effect: Countries like Hungary and Poland could adopt similar laws.

Impact on UK elections: Labour will use the ruling to attack the Tories as “retrograde”, but 54% of swing voters approve the decision (IPSOS).

THE BRITISH PARADOX


While the government promotes inclusiveness in the NHS (free hormone therapy), the Court signals a clear stop to absolute self-determination. A contradiction that reflects the divided cultural climate: progressive in the cities (London, Brighton), conservative in the suburbs and countryside.